Skip to main content
electrocd
  • This website is also available in English.

Blog

366 results
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • petits Big Bangs, Marcelle Deschênes in Musicworks

    “Creating and Contributing: The Expansive Spirit of Marcelle Deschênes”, Rosemary Mountain, Musicworks, no. 86, June 1, 2003
    Sunday, June 1, 2003 Press

    […] (Deschênes) can shape any and all sounds exactly to match whatever form or phrase she envisions. Her compositions are truly expressive of human emotions rather than being explorations of sound, and she avoids the common pitfall of creating dizzying configurations in surround sound, despite the context of the early of-art images used in works like Écran Humain (with Paul Saint-Jean) and Lux (with Renée Bourassa). […]

    Her compositions are truly expressive of human emotions…

    Aenviron: one, Isostasie, flume ridge.halifax.lisbon, Relisten, Birds and Reeds, Train de nuit (Noord 3-683), The Animals in These Cages Are Injured in Some Way and Would Probably Die If Released, Into India, Natasha Barrett, John Hudak, V. V., Hildegard Westerkamp in electrocd.com

    “Sounds Around: Field Recordings in Electroacoustics”, David Turgeon, electrocd.com, June 1, 2003
    Sunday, June 1, 2003 Press

    Field recordings have always fascinated electroacoustic composers, ever since Pierre Schaeffer’s Cinq études de bruits (1948), featuring processed train sounds. With R Murray Schafer’s Vancouver Soundscape 1973 (1972-73), these everyday sounds are articulated around a discourse which will be termed “sound ecology,” whereby sounds keep their original meaning, and no longer serve as anecdotic content to be used and abused at the composer’s whim. Jonty Harrison synthesises these two approaches in his short text {cnotice:imed_0052-0001/About Évidence matérielle/cnotice}.

    Actually, every composer seems to have their own unique approach towards field recordings. If sound ecology has seen the burgeoning of microphone artists such as Claude Schryer and of course Hildegard Westerkamp and her famous {cpiste:imed_9631-1.3/Kits Beach Soundwalk/cpiste} (1989), sound travels such as French duo Kristoff K Roll’s CD Corazón Road (1993) are, in this respect, closer to the art of documentary film. Meanwhile, Brooklyn-based composer Jon Hudak starts off with an extremely minimalist palette so as to seek out the “essence” of sounds, which, to the listener, translate into soft, dreamy soundscapes. A student of the aforementioned Jonty Harrison, Natasha Barrett conceives beautiful landscapes of sounds with very discreet field recordings, that retain an aesthetic likeness to the acousmatic tradition.

    Many young composers settle into this landscape (of sound…) and their work is of such interest to us, it would be a shame not to let them be heard. We shall first mention the California-based V. V. (real name Ven Voisey), who organises his found sounds into an architecture reminescent of “old school” musique concrète—doing so, he uncovers a previously unheard aesthetic affinity between Schaeffer and Merzbow… With Relisten, Austrian composer Bernhard Gal guides us through his carefully selected episodes of “found musics” (that is, musical structures that preexist within the environment.) Finally, because of its numerous ideas and its incredible pacing, the surprising flume ridge.halifax.lisbon (2001) from Montréal composer Cal Crawford will undoubtedly seduce listeners looking for unheard acousmatic grounds.

    Two small treats to end with. First, the pretty Aenviron: one mini-CDR is a simple thread of five pure field recordings (with no processing!). After all, if there is such a thing as cinema for the ear, why shouldn’t there be a photo album for the ear! And to close the loop, may we also suggest to make a stop at Lionel Marchetti’s recent mini-CD with the evocative title, Train de nuit (Noord 3-683) (1998-99). This work for one loudspeaker, dedicated (couldn’t you guess?) to Pierre Schaeffer, remind us again of the ever renewed importance of environmental sources in feeding the electroacoustic ocean.

    Isostasie in Audion

    “Review”, Alan Freeman, Audion, no. 48, June 1, 2003
    Sunday, June 1, 2003 Press

    This one sounds like a mixture of digital “granular” synthesis and all sorts of concrete manipulation. It’s a mass of sonic swarms and textures that scatter and dive around, sometimes in big churning fabrics (kinda Stockhausen like) and sometimes in sensory collages (Redolfi and Zanési realms). The resultant album is one that tends to zoom through its 77 minutes without getting too engrossing, thus I’m unable to say much more!

    … a mass of sonic swarms and textures that scatter and dive around…

    La limite du bruit in Audion

    “Review”, Alan Freeman, Audion, no. 48, June 1, 2003
    Sunday, June 1, 2003 Press

    A New Zealand electroacoustic artist, who currently resides here in Leicester, he surprised me when he came into the UT shop, as I had no idea that Leicester’s De Montfort University had an electronic music studio. Of course, I asked him if he knew Denis Smalley (another New Zealander resident in the UK) which — of course — he did. Naturally we also discussed how bizarre it is that the only label around willing to issue his CD hails from Canada!

    Anyway, on to the review: “The Edge of Noise” is an apt title for something that starts off sounding like the sounds of someone decorating or building, as we have clanks and scrapes, things being scoured and ripped, and all manner of what the French call “bruitism” the art of “sound as art”. How it goes on, becoming ever more extreme when more processing is added. Compression, distortion, granular chopping up and reconstruction, all make for an uncompromising and highly creative mixture. However, the absence of musical references make it a diffcult listen, it tends to all get a bit overwhelming.

    … an uncompromising and highly creative mixture.

    Cycle du son in Audion

    “Review”, Alan Freeman, Audion, no. 48, June 1, 2003
    Sunday, June 1, 2003 Press

    Dhomont’s Cycle du son in four parts is a fascinating study in the art of painting with sound, with clusters and fragments of sonic sources usually manipulated way beyond their original context. In this way the techniques used in these works are quite rightly compared to the pioneering Études of Pierre Schaeffer, however the results are quite different, and very much late 20th Century. I would personally compare these digital manipulations to the similarly spacious, semi-musical constructions of Denis Smalley. The same air of invention, use of form and dynamics make a vivid and engrossing concoction that is simply “indescribable”.

    … a vivid and engrossing concoction…
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45