Écraser l’autre in ambientblog.net
But Bassal obviously wanted ‘to throw a cat amongst the pigeons’ with
“Acousmatic music exists only as the prisoner of an unsympathetic, exclusivist, and ascetic convention.[…] Shielded as I am by acousmatics’ total lack of exposure, I can allow myself to disobey any and all rules. So here’s my “process”
He then continues to rub some extra salt in the wound by stating that acousmatic composers wrongfully ignore (or avoid with disdain) the technical skills of commercial producers and the new tools being developed in other genres.
“And yet, some of those techniques are based on serious analytical research, for instance on treating potential conflicts — or unexpected collisions — between sound materials themselves and the human ear. And those techniques (often) work. […] A quick survey of the big names of acousmatic music shows that no one in the “community” has exhibited a fraction of the creative genius required to compete with the massive knowledge and techniques collectively gathered by pop music producers in recent decades.”
Ouch
Does this mean that Bassal’s music on
Not really, if you ask me — these fascinating soundscapes still perfectly fit the label. At times, parts may be more accessible than some of the more hardcore acousmatic music. And maybe Bassal used some of the ‘commercial’ producer’s techniques to achieve his results. As he says himself
In any case, this is not only a fun read (full text on the Bandcamp page), but it’s also a fun listen — especially if you can appreciate these kinds of wild-ride, abstract compositions created from amazing sounds.






