Contes de la mémoire
Jon Appleton
… a beautiful recording of computer music… — Earwaves, USA
A startling piece of digital composition and yet another example of
Appleton ’s warmth and irrepressible humanness… — Sonomu, UK
- Composer(s): Jon Appleton
- Author(s): Jean-Claude Risset
- Cover image: Esme Thompson
CD (IMED 9635, 1996)
- 1San Francisco Airport Rock (1996), 3:23fixed medium
- 2Dima Dobralsa Domoy (1996), 7:16fixed medium
- 3In Medias Res (1978), 9:44fixed medium
- 4Homage to Orpheus (1969), 3:10fixed medium
- 5Times Square Times Ten (1969), 9:00fixed medium
- 6Newark Airport Rock (1969), 2:12fixed medium
- 7CCCP (In Memoriam: Anatoly Kuznetsov) (1969), 5:14fixed medium
- 8Spuyten Duyvil (1967), 2:58fixed medium
- 9Georganna’s Fancy (1966), 2:33fixed medium
- 10Chef d’œuvre (1967), 2:23fixed medium
- Label: empreintes DIGITALes
- IMED 9635
- 1996
- UCC 771028963522
- Total duration: 48:54
- Opak
- 127 mm × 142 mm × 10 mm
- 70 g
On the web
Download (IMED 9635_NUM, 1996)
- This item can be downloaded and/or listened to at empreintesdigitales.bandcamp.com.
- 1San Francisco Airport Rock (1996), 3:23fixed medium
- 2Dima Dobralsa Domoy (1996), 7:16fixed medium
- 3In Medias Res (1978), 9:44fixed medium
- 4Homage to Orpheus (1969), 3:10fixed medium
- 5Times Square Times Ten (1969), 9:00fixed medium
- 6Newark Airport Rock (1969), 2:12fixed medium
- 7CCCP (In Memoriam: Anatoly Kuznetsov) (1969), 5:14fixed medium
- 8Spuyten Duyvil (1967), 2:58fixed medium
- 9Georganna’s Fancy (1966), 2:33fixed medium
- 10Chef d’œuvre (1967), 2:23fixed medium
- Label: empreintes DIGITALes
- IMED 9635_NUM
- 1996
- UCC 771028963584
- Total duration: 48:54
Liner notes
Illuminating
In his music as well as in his talk,
Jon’s music is very diverse — his rich personality gets through in several ways. I am especially fond of his tape pieces, which display imagination, craft, humor, tenderness. Thanks to digital recording, we can now hear them without the old surface noises and scratches. This disc is a denial to those who claim that tape music is dead
—
Memory’s Tales, the Works
Looking back over the thirty years of electroacoustic music represented by the music on this recording, it can be difficult to untangle the web of personal, cultural and technological influences which shaped these pieces. Unlike my instrumental music from the same years, in which one can observe a certain stylistic consistency, my work in electroacoustic music consisted of three, distinct approaches.
Two of these approaches appeared early in my music
The third approach, not represented on this recording, are the ten years I spent composing electroacoustic music for the Synclavier, a live performance instrument I helped develop. These pieces combined the stylistics elements of my instrumental and electroacoustic music.
I began composing electroacoustic music because it was the only aspect of ‘new music’ in the 1960s that I found compelling. The serial music I was urged to compose while in graduate school, and that we were told would be the ‘music of the future,’ seemed emotionally vapid to me. In the final years of the 20th century, young composers look with nostalgia to the 1960s and the liberation artists were supposed to have felt. We did feel that there were no ‘rules’ and, as I told
Perhaps the greatest frustration I experienced as a composer of electroacoustic music was the constant need to develop a new technique for the various equipment used to produce the music. I still use my piano technique, but have long ago abandoned my ability to splice tape, control tape loops, patch an analog synthesizer, use various computer-music languages… Now I struggle with software like MAX and hardware like ProTools III knowing that in another decade the tools will have changed again. There are some composers who relish the challenge of new technology and the artistic opportunities it provides. For some, new technology has provided the sole motivation for being a composer. For me, studio technique was a necessary evil which could have the advantage of forcing me to limit my materials and to be less facile when composing.
I can still remember the excitement I felt beginning each new piece when I first began composing electroacoustic music. I had no idea what I was doing, where I was going or what would be the result of my hours in the studio. Nevertheless, a recognizable style did emerge and today, when I start a new piece, is a fear that I can do nothing truly new. Of course there is the satisfaction the skills honed over the years will enable me to produce a composition worth hearing, I do wish that I could recapture that youthful quality of seeing the world in a new way. I am sure all experienced artists feel the same way.
The music should stand for itself and thus my comments about the individual works on this recording will be brief, ancillary and dedicated to providing information that might be of interest to other practitioners and critics of electroacoustic music. The listeners can take care of themselves and stop reading here.
Having spent the year 1965-66 at the Columbia-Princeton Electronic Music Center (New York City) — where we believed that our artistic work was the center of the universe — I was forced to reconsider my work as a composer when I moved to rural Vermont in 1967. Suddenly I was confronted by the fact few of the people in my village knew what a composer did and none knew about electroacoustic music. That same year, stranded by weather at the Newark airport, I took the opportunity to ask my fellow passengers “what do you think about the new electronic music
As mentioned above, the pieces
The opposite is true of
My relationship with Russia (and the Soviet Union) has been long and complex. My father was born in Kishinev (Moldova) and my step father in Ufa (Russia). My parents dedicated a large part of their lives to Communism. I was raised listening to Russian folk and symphonic music and to believe that the future could be found in the Soviet Union. Imbued with an interest in politics, many of my pieces would have both artistic and political purposes such as
In the process of developing the Synclavier, I used several digital systems to compose pieces. Some of these pieces are
For many years I have wanted to acknowledge those musical colleagues whose musics has helped shape my own. The list — see below — includes family, friends, and some musicians I have never met.
Thanks to
—
Some recommended items
In the press
Review
Electroacoustic music from Dartmouth College composer and author with a beautiful recording of computer music that is similar to his tape works, which are some of his best. Liner notes are great guide to his music and explain it well.
Kritik
Review
Review
From the same year comes
In short,
This disc has all the traits of high quality production present in the empreintes DIGITALes releases from DIFFUSION i MéDIA. The sound is marvelous, the liner notes good, the layout excellent. The cover photo is of the painting
Review
American
Both artists are preoccupied with texture, and as such, few traces of melody or even conventional structure are to be found in their compositions. As with most experimental music, the focus is on the listener’s reaction to the sounds as opposed to the composer’s delight in making them.
The most illuminating composition on
Review
The two pieces around which the album revolves, for me, are
The two sets of answers are nearly indistinguishable compendiums of blithe ignorance, indiscriminate approval, rank intransigence and dopey techno-mysticism. I don’t know whether
Review
This CD begins and ends with random street interviews on computer generated music. The techniques employed are varied as the answers of the interview participants.
Review
Review
Review
The popularity of computer music being what it is, even a distinguished electronic musician/composer like
Review
The guru of the synclavier has released a couple of new works, but mostly old pieces that hadn’t been available in decades.
Further Out
More texts
- Voir, February 13, 1997






